Number 9! What's up with that?

O.K. I can't be the only one who thinks it is patently absurd that we are number 9 on this list solely because they failed to assess the damage to Devi and Casey's house during the last Comet survey. That and the weighting of criteria based on population density instead of child density. Who wants or needs a playground where there are no kids?! Are others as perplexed by the distribution and assessment of these criteria as I am? Please let the Parks Commissioners know. Come to the next meeting this Thursday at City Hall, or get a bunch of your neighbors to e mail them ASAP. And feel free to post a copy of your messages under the comments below. I'd love to hear what others have to say.